What are the principal strengths and weaknesses of structural analyses of fabrications? (S Fogarty) The study of myth is a much disputed area of academia, primarily because the subject hobo be studied from so some(prenominal) points of view, and is of interest to a plethora of scholarly subjects: psychological, anthropological, sociological, and religious studies all take a great deal of interest in the subject. Also, the very spirit of myth is at question: there defend been many definitions of myth and its role within culture and society, from the view of myth as a remnant of the unconscious, to the view of myth as a form of communication. There is also a commutation problem when dealing with myth, that of incongruity: many cultures have myths that would get along to be mutually exclusive, for example two entirely diametric creation myths, and yet these myths are continually accepted condescension the oddity. Myth is a very complicated subject to examine, merely the development of the field in forward-looking times has been brisk and highly productive.
The key developments of the modern study of myth have been, firstly, the realisation of the importance of myth to both primitive and modern cultures, secondly the development of psychological theory in wish to myth, and thirdly, the ?structural theory of myth propounded by the great cut anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss. This theory, complicated to say the least, centres on the belief that myth contains a kind of universal structure, and is at least as grand as language as a tool of communication. This is the theory of Levi-Strauss, and will be the central point of discussion of this essay. It is necessary, for the purposes of this essay, to short outline the theory of structuralism, and its origin: I will and so move on and discuss the strengths and weaknesses...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.