Sonnet 16

Firstly I imagine mainly that this poem depict be interoperated in two different agencys. The counterbalance way Is that the writer is in come with a woman upgrade in vulgar manners. The other which is my interpretation is that the writer Pablo Neruda is proclaiming his hit the sack for a certain character by describing it in a unusual way. He compares his love for her to things that people wouldnt commonly compare love to. Such as scenic and suitable things. He compares it to un bloomed flowers and dark things. He loves her as if she was one with him, non as if she were an object or prize or nonetheless some other human being. He loves her without knowing how or when or from where. Which operator he doesnt love her because of her physical or mental traits, but because he just does. Secondly, I believe that synecdochic language in this poem helps determine the centre a lot more than if there wasnt any. The spring uses the haggling as if a lot , meaning he i s comparison two different things to create one full planetary idea. In this text he mentions that I do non love you as if you were a salt-rose or topaz or carnations of arrows the fire shoots off.

Here he is comparing her to elegant and amazing things but then shooting it down and give off that she isnt any of those things. If I were to only read the introductory paragraph of the text I would think that he doesnt really love her. But as the text grows you propel to believe that he does truly love her in an positive degree manner. In conclusion I believe that the poem is essentially about the author s true love, comparing her to beautiful thin! gs and saying that she isnt any of it then saying that she is loved like a plant that never blooms, in the end this all comes unneurotic and really shows how true and compelling love should be. It shouldnt be stereotypical beauty.If you want to get a full essay, invest it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper