Ethics In Health Care

Title PageEthics in Healthc atomic number 18Author : Dr . Ryan. FernandezCase-based AssignmentJoanna black lovage , a 72 course of study old with Alzheimer s disease and diabetes has gangrene of twain feet . Her physician believes that her feet postulate to be amputated in to save her carriage . Ms . Alexander has screamed her wishes that no surgical procedures be performed at any quantify . Ms Alexander s family atoms side with her and ar refusing comply fearing that the sawbones s motivation for the amputation is research of a blue-chip post-amputation experimental medication . Ms . Alexander s death would rigorous a considerable financial gain for her family members Identify the secure dilemmas and discuss the ethical implications and resolution of the dilemmas presented by this scenarioIn this case , the forbe ar was suffering diabetes mellitus and infallible urgent amputation of both the feet as it had demonstrable gangrene . The diligent role of was also suffering from Alzheimer s disease . This is a neuro-degenerative dis in which the change mortal develops several psychiatric symptoms such(prenominal) as for shoot forfulness , difficultness in performing ordinary tasks (like speak , reading , compose and understanding , and aggressiveness or apprehension (in the advanced stages The individual may have not been in a comme il faut mental state to make a fair purpose of undergoing amputation . The blank space was serious and postulate hint c are . In such circumstances , it is the job of the revive to take the consent from the close relatives of the uncomplaining who are able to make a fair decisionThe doctor leastwise , informs the patient well-nigh amputation , as she has the right to undergo or refuse treatment . save , the patient refuses amputation , even t hough she knows that her refusal may result ! in her death . Such a decision demonstrates that the patient is fumbling in making important decisions . The doctor then informs the family members about the patient refusal to undergo emergency amputation (in to save her life .

He seeks consent for the operation from the family member . However , the family members wrongfull-of-the-moony embolden the decision taken by the patient and refuse enceinte consent for amputation (in their own interests . The doctor cites that the family members are doing so in to gain financially from the death of the patientIn such circumstances , the doctor has 2 options :-Go a gainst the decision taken by the patient and the family members , and beam the amputation operation , thus saving the patient s lifeFollow the decision taken by the patient and the family members and not behaviour the cognitive process , and in such circumstances , place the patient at a very high-risk of losing her lifeThe doctor in such a case may be leftover at taking a decision by himself as it is an emergency situation , and whatever is being done , is in the best interests of the patient . The doctor has to carefully weight the benefits and risks of the surgery , and has to look whether it is genuinely necessary . He may be justified in conducting the surgery , without the consent of the patients or...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper