The Hobby Lobby Lawsuit

c atomic number 18 and privacy, discrimination, internet privacy, racial profiling, secrecy, prison house conditions, consumer privacy, immigration detention, pedigree control, and country immigration laws are the just about prominent concerns in immediatelys society. These issues have galore(postnominal) sides and origins debating each side. Right at once birth control is integrity of the top issues in the media.\nThe call into question on whether to supply employees the take in of contraceptives is a highly debated take. galore(postnominal) traditional debaters are against the judge custodyt because of spectral views. They believe that sexual intercourse should be saved for marriage and that there should be no need for birth control if these views are draw into practice. The opposing side of the argument is the people who believe that if men are given condoms, women should be given birth control. This topic is important because it pertains directly to womens right s given to them by the constitution. In many situations, men are given more freedoms accordingly women.\nOne example of this on doing, Is the avocation mansion lawsuit. On March 25, 2014 Hobby Lobby went up against the Government in a Supreme hook Lawsuit against the Affordable interest Act. They stated that the Act was criminal due to piety and traditions. Hobby Lobby agreed to catch up with for some other forms of contraceptives such as Plan B or Ella, but would not hire for forms of birth control pills and devices that shutdown human life. The Washington speckle writes, The question these cases are desire to solve is whether for-profit companies have a right to exercise religious freedom under the spectral Freedom Restoration Act, a federal law passed in 1993 that states the Government shall not comfortably burden a mortals exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability. CNN illustrious that, Three federal appeals courts arou nd the country have stricken down the contraception reporting rule, while two other appeals courts have upheld it...