Edward R. Murrow & Socrates Essay

Indestructible fearlessness, persistence and public service drove two Socrates and Murrow to live their lives with unwavering commit workforcet for truth, critical intellection and unbendable integrity. With these values, Socrates and Murrow make their own lives as vivid ex adenosine monophosphateles of truth and veracity. They set the standards for all concomitant Western philosophy and the ideal broadcast journalism respectively. Nevertheless, their enduring fearlessness may have brought them also to make half of themselves as b bely ego maniacs or perhaps, self-centered intellectuals.Socrates pursuit of virtue and his strict inclination to truth clashed with the current course of Athenian politics and society. During his time, Socrates appears to have been a critic of democracy wherein some scholars had interpreted his trial as an musing of political infighting. He boldly face the charges make by the board as seen in Platos Apology, an account of Socratess (unsuccessful) s peech in his own defense before the Athenian jury. Socratess speech includes a detailed description of the motives and goals of philosophical activity as he near it, together with a passionate declaration of its value for life.I was real struck when Socrates purposefully gave a defiant defense to the jury because he believed he would be better off dead. With this assertment, we can say that Socrates rightfully happens to be a man of truth and valor similar to his new-fashioned counterpart, Edward Murrow. According to Wadleigh, Murrow, at every juncture, did what he thought was right. He took risks that at the time seemed outrageous and he was not afraid of eachthing. Furthermore, his exceptional courage is seen when he let Senator McCarthy hang himself with his open criticism program- merely without any expose (Wershba & Hottlelet).It was found out that Socratess works are often philosophical or dramatic texts rather than straightforward histories. check to Murrow, hi s voice made the words catch fire The way he could add drama to the simplest looking text made him amazing (Wershba & Kalb). Murrow offered himself to public service analogous to the teaching life of Socrates. Socrates pointedly declined to seize payment for his work with students whereas Murrow fearlessly did his job as a broadcaster. He was a driven reporter truly driven to tell stack what was going on. He do it with intensity (Hottlelet) Plato refers to Socrates as the gadfly of the state (as the gadfly stings the horse into action, so Socrates fuddled Athens), insofar as he irritated the establishment with considerations of justice and the pursuit of goodness. If Socrates stung Athens, then Murrow stung America using his charisma, integrity and personal standards (Wershba). It is Socrates and Murrows critical sentiment that made themselves men of worth. Socrates showed this (critical hark backing) through his philosophical works while Murrow made this appear through his jobs as a writer and broadcaster.These two men were really exceptional by committing themselves in pursuit of truth. However, their deep thinking and boldness has somehow conflicted their commitment to truth thus making half of themselves as merely ego maniacs or self-centered intellectuals. It was supported by the reasons why Murrow left his job at CBS Then there was the former(a) side of Murrow, the driven news reporter. Murrow made Harvest of Shame and showed the malodorous spots of American life. CBS Chairman William Paley didnt like that. It scared off sponsors. Paley wanted it tame. Murrow wanted it real. (Hottlelet) another(prenominal) statement was from Hewitt telling that Murrow would talk with his somebody to Person guests beforehand Murrow felt that for entertainment some discussion to earn the subjects was legitimate. Paley disagreed, so Murrow left. He has that hidden pride in his self. Like what Ive said earlier, he did what he thought was right which is to l eave CBS. Another thing I noticed about Murrow is his sense of egoism or perhaps, self-importance. It was stated in one of the interviews that Murrow selected very good people, who, in his presence, got better.Those approximately him never wanted to disappoint or embarrass Edso they pushed themselves to their outer limits He set the pace he was the example. (Kalb) This statement was except supported by Hottlelet He never gave instructions. He knew his worth. I think he just expected the trained reporters he hired to watch over his example. The life of Socrates appears to be really parallel to the life of Edward Murrow. By undermentioned what they thought was right and by pursuing the truth, they made half of themselves as the greatest and the most defiant men in history but half as conceited and egoistic individuals of all times.