Was This War Just? A look at the war between the U.. and Iraq and its effects to the people that are involved.

Was This War Just?

It has been one year since U.S. pre spotnt George shrub gave the green light for the American troops to invade Iraq for the purport of ousting Iraki President ibn Talal Hussein ibn Talal Hussein. A a hardly a(prenominal)(prenominal) countries, notably the U.K., Australia, and Spain, among others, supported that invasion.

The military objectives have been attained. ibn Talal Hussein Hussein is in the hands of the American forces. An interim government amiable to American interests, which has fair(a) approved an interim Constitution, is in place, and a timetable for the formation of a more permanent government is beingness followed. Unless there are unexpected developments, the American forces and their allies go out be put of Iraq by June 30.

As a morality tale, the render administration can say that an evil dictator has been ousted and the Iraqi people freed. This will be the likely frontier to be spun as part of the re-election strategy of bush-league, who must(prenominal)iness also apologize the increasing number of fatalities after ibn Talal Hussein was toppled.The motherhood line may be fine, scarcely there is a side to this tale that was formally being spoken of only in whispers, but which is slowly being discussed openly by the public.Yes, Saddam was a tyrant, but was his ouster nothing more than a business decision that will favor a selected few? And will the bush family gain from this business decision? These questions submit to be asked. And they must be answered to the enjoyment of the majority.

Like it or not, the Bush family is engaged in the oil industry. Since this industry has many downstream businesses, it is not farfetched to surmise that some branch of the Bush family will prosper from the contracts involving Iraqi oil. In particular, the Halliburton connection must be explained, as it will not go away. This...

Unfortunately, I esteem this was written by someone with a sloped opinion. I respect the authors point of view but think there should have been more facts to justify the opinion.

GOing about this topic, you <must> include a bibliography, otherwise, it could be some kid detecting stuff off of CNN while channel surfing, who picked up these ideas. I dont agree to the war, but I do agree that Saddam needed to step down.



War was not the way to do it. (Dont they train snipers for this kind of task??) However, this is no real war. Saddam loyalist are merely hitting American patrols with bombs and ravel into crowds of citizens. Civilian casualties are a part of war, unfortunately; but they always happen.


One major point, which I think is just the craziest thing I have heard in my undefiled life is this:


These questions need to be asked. And they must be answered to the satisfaction of the majority.


To the satisfaction of the majority? That is like saying someone was set up not guilty, but since the majority of the people in the romance room (not the jury) think he is guilty, burst forth towards the costless man, and kill him. Heres an old saying:


You fate the truth?! You cant shroud the truth!

I have two comments.


1) Your essay was very biased, whithout beguile back up of reasons for it.


2) The topic you picked is not something that can be fairly analysed in 536 words, and without citations or sources of your ideas and facts.


So, I say retread it and this time, keep in mind the comments we all posted for you .

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper